W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Alternative Text for DNT: 0 (ACTION-209, ISSUE-148)

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:03:42 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <4512504.HfO6LfdZpa@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

for EU consent purposes we need a more detailed list of allowances 
(aka "at least") I took an action with Shane, but this is overdue. 
So this is just a heads up that I believe we need not only to 
release the restrictions from the compliance spec, but also a set of 
positive permissions for the ad chains to work in the EU context. 
Because otherwise, DNT:0 will not give permissions in regulated 
environments (also think about Australia & Japan)

I presented yesterday at the IAB Europe and there was some interest 
in providing further input, hopefully. 


On Wednesday 13 June 2012 10:43:35 Jonathan Mayer wrote:
> Normative:
> i. In General
> A DNT: 0 exception allows a website to conduct specific practices
> that are otherwise prohibited by this specification.
> ii. Explanation Requirement
> When a website requests a DNT: 0 exception, it MUST clearly
> explain those practices to the user.
> iii. Multiple Semantics
> If a website maintains multiple semantics for DNT: 0, it is
> responsible for associating the proper semantic with a user
> agent.  If a website cannot determine the semantics associated
> with a DNT: 0 exception, it may not rely on the exception.
> Non-Normative Discussion:
> i. Legal Implications
> This specification does not take a position on whether the DNT: 0
> exception mechanism is sufficient to satisfy any legal
> requirements.
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 00:04:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:51 UTC