Because I thought we said earlier (in DC) that we expected browsers would only show exception UI in response to a user gesture. Otherwise, you end up with popups on every page (which apparently some people think is an OK outcome). On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 13 June 2012 15:50:23 Ian Fette wrote: > > You say "you can trigger an exception" but that's a HECK of a lot > > harder for a third party to do. > > Ian, > > you said, "if I do not respond, I'm not on the hook". > > This is something else then saying: "I will never ever accept any > token from UA string IE". > > And to trigger an exception is actually a good test. I still believe > that we should arrive in the 21th century. That means we have to > start thinking about what it makes a HECK less hard for a third > party to trigger an exception. > > If this is all about revenue and not about technology and users, you > could negotiate every cookie directly with the FTC or the > Commission. > > But I hope I can tease you to better technology. So how can we make > exceptions easier? You say it's hard. Why? Because of the origin > constraints? > > Rigo > >Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 23:38:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 13 June 2012 23:38:51 GMT