W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: DNT:0

From: イアンフェッティ <ifette@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:57:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF4kx8dC68sORarXwQpSga=vsxZSJB6eBKjDE+5YKowFY6PF0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Specifically, I would say:

“Upon receiving a request with DNT:0, a site may assume the user has
provided them with explicit consent to operate as normal and continue with
its standard data collection, retention, and use practices including but
not limited to the placement and reading of cookies and personalization
services. Restrictions on requests received with DNT:1 do not apply to
requests received with DNT:0". I think it may not be strictly necessary to
state this, but I like being quite clear.

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) <ifette@google.com>wrote:

> Shane, that seems fine. Do you have any objection to the part of the text
> stating "Additionally, restrictions placed on the collection and use of
> data by this recommendation shall not apply to any data received as part of
> a request with a DNT:0 signal."
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
>> Ian,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> That’s fair – then let’s state it in that manner and add a “including but
>> not limited to” to provide flexibility but address the two key business
>> practices head-on.****
>>
>> “Upon receiving a request with DNT:0, a site may assume the user has
>> provided them with explicit consent to operate as normal and continue with
>> its standard data collection, retention, and use practices including but
>> not limited to the placement and reading of cookies and personalization
>> services.”****
>>
>> - Shane****
>>
>> *From:* Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) [mailto:ifette@google.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:46 AM
>> *To:* Shane Wiley
>> *Cc:* public-tracking@w3.org Group WG
>> *Subject:* Re: DNT:0****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I guess the problem i have is that "normal" and "standard practices" may
>> not be clear, e.g. what does that mean in Europe where regulators are
>> trying to say "normal" is "nothing unless the user consents?" -- I was
>> trying to get at DNT:0 == consent.****
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
>> wrote:****
>>
>> Suggest we remove discussion of specific business practices since those
>> are still under debate (akin to a definition for “tracking”) and simply
>> state that DNT:0 means a site may operate as normal.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> “Upon receiving a request with DNT:0, a site may operate as normal and
>> continue with its standard data collection, retention, and use practices.”
>> ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> - Shane****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> *From:* Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) [mailto:ifette@google.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:18 AM
>> *To:* public-tracking@w3.org Group WG
>> *Subject:* DNT:0****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> This is meant to satisfy ISSUE-148 and ACTION-208 (definition of DNT:0)**
>> **
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> "Upon receiving a request with DNT:0, a site may reasonably interpret
>> such a request as consent for personalization of content based on the
>> user's identity or activity that the server may be aware of or become aware
>> of, and the collection and retention of such activity, as well as consent
>> to such mechanisms as may be required to collect said activity, including,
>> but not limited to, the use of cookies. Additionally, restrictions placed
>> on the collection and use of data by this recommendation shall not apply to
>> any data received as part of a request with a DNT:0 signal."****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 14:58:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:30 UTC