- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 12:56:55 -0700
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:33 , Rigo Wenning wrote: > No way!! W3C has a policy that says: Browser sniffing is evil. I didn't mention browser sniffing; and it should be pretty clear that since 'for some other reason' is very vague, its compliance is indeterminate (and we could add a note to that effect, I guess). > > For the rest, I agree with David and have my WE now. we hope :-) > > Rigo > > On Friday 08 June 2012 11:32:02 David Singer wrote: >>> David, >>> >>> >>> >>> I agree with everything except remaining silent on uncompliant >>> behavior and how to appropriately notify a user that their UA >>> signal is non-compliant, won't be honored, and to provide >>> them with meaningful choices from that point. >> so, you'd like an explicit 'because' clause? >> - for some other reason that is explained in more detail at >> the following URL >> >> and allow this 'for more info' URL (if its not already in the >> header and well-known resource)? >> >> That's fine by me. > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Friday, 8 June 2012 19:57:25 UTC