W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Transitive third party exceptions

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 07:17:05 +0200
To: Kevin Smith <kevsmith@adobe.com>
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "ifette@google.com" <ifette@google.com>
Message-ID: <3313135.QKeAEgWUBM@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

part of your scenario is overcomplicating things language-wise. A third 
party with an exception receives DNT;0, right? So both third party cases are 
the same. 

On Friday 01 June 2012 14:18:04 Kevin Smith wrote:
> I do not think we want to introduce another variation of limitations
> unless the benefit is huge.

The benefit is a working exception system worldwide, even for chains that 
can't be predicted. IMHO this is huge and the limitations and complications 
are small. 

And if you want to do business as usual and add stuff to your profile, get a 
direct DNT;0 signal, get a web-wide exception for your service or some out 
of band consent. 

Received on Saturday, 2 June 2012 05:17:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:50 UTC