W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > June 2012

Re: ISSUE-16, ACTION-166: define (data) collection

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:37 +0200
To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <669321966.VCDzDHHMgn@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
Shane, 

On Friday 01 June 2012 14:14:40 Shane Wiley wrote:
> In my opinion this is a key divide in the debate for Permitted Uses vs.
> Unlinkability.

Unfortunately, your use of the terminology is neither correct nor helpful. 
The divide between collect-but-do-not-target vs do-not-track was solved in 
Princeton. I recollect the same as David. The collect-but-do-not-target is 
US only and was repeatedly rejected by all possible regulators. Can we 
actually stop playing whack-a-mole?

Rigo
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2012 04:37:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:30 UTC