Re: diff of TPE editing since the FPWD

The doc should say tracking, not cross-tracking.  Cross-tracking is a subset of tracking.  Users want (and the W3C process reflects) the need to focus on overall Tracking.


Jeffrey Chester
Center for Digital Democracy
1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 550
Washington, DC 20009
www.democraticmedia.org
www.digitalads.org
202-986-2220

On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Rigo Wenning wrote:

> Hi Roy, 
> 
> the technical specification consistently uses "cross-site tracking" for every 
> mention of tracking. Despite some quick search, I haven't found a decision to 
> only talk about "cross-site tracking". Can you indicate where this was 
> decided?
> 
> If it wasn't already decided, I unfortunately must raise an issue. Because 
> saying "cross-site tracking" consistently in the technical preference 
> expression specification would change the scope of the DNT-header and reduce it 
> to mere cross-site data collection. While I say you expressing that 
> preference, I also saw opposition against that wording. Additionally, saying 
> "cross-site tracking" does not correspond to the first party requirements 
> indicated in the Tracking Compliance Specification and also trespasses into the 
> scope of the tracking compliance specification. 
> 
> Best, 
> 
> Rigo
> 
> On Tuesday 10 January 2012 18:12:51 Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> It may be easier to follow the discussion tomorrow (and next week)
>> if everyone can see what has been changed in the TPE spec.  Enclosed is
>> an html diff file that highlights the changes since the last
>> published working draft.
>> 
>> ....Roy
> 
>