- From: (unknown charset) Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:44:21 +0100
- To: (unknown charset) public-tracking@w3.org
Hi! OK. Let's use Zakim as usual - it provides IRC integration. matthias On 1/3/2012 6:48 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote: > … and to avoid confusion: I propose to use the W3C zakim bridge tomorrow, as usual. > > Thanks, > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) > > > > > > > > On 2012-01-03, at 18:19 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > >> With thanks to Matthias for making the IBM bridge available as a back-up, the good news: The W3C bridge is back. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org> >>> Subject: Zakim teleconference bridge is up >>> Date: January 3, 2012 18:01:47 +0100 >>> To: system-notices@w3.org >>> Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/4F03347B.80200@w3.org> >>> List-Id: <w3t.w3.org> >>> >>> The failed power supply to the Zakim bridge control computer has been >>> replaced and the W3C Zakim teleconference bridge is back in service. >>> >>> We apologize for the inconvenience. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2012 18:47:37 UTC