W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > April 2012

RE: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal

From: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 05:10:49 +0000
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
CC: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BB17D596C94A854E9EE4171D33BBCC810CEBB8@TK5EX14MBXC136.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
David,

I don't quite understand what you are trying to say here.

JC

-----Original Message-----
From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 8:15 AM
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann
Cc: Shane Wiley; public-tracking@w3.org
Subject: Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal


On Apr 26, 2012, at 15:59 , Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> * Shane Wiley wrote:
>> <Normative>
>> 
>> Sites MAY override a user's DNT preference if they have received explicit, informed consent to do so.
> 
> That means "a user's DNT preference" does not apply to this situation.
> I see no reason why this should be an "override" rather than a "n/a".

Because the user is sending "DNT:1" and also "you have my consent";  these are in conflict.  It's by no means not applicable to state which overrides which.

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 05:11:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:27 UTC