W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > April 2012

Re: action-159 Draft shorter language to describe conditions for consent

From: Lauren Gelman <gelman@blurryedge.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:07:10 -0700
Cc: Justin Brookman <justin@cdt.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E1785479-52D8-4664-9AD6-CE704989D079@blurryedge.com>
To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>

Interesting.  But you are relying on a UI in a UA to make this meaningful to the average person.  What about putting some burden on the company by requiring that consent be presumed to expire after X days unless the user reaffirms  under the same standard?

>> 
>> 
>> Again, for each interaction with a user that has an out-of-band consent, the response/well-known header will:
>> - remind the user of this fact (if they have DNT:1 set)
>> - provide a resource (link) to alter this consent AT ANY TIME

Lauren Gelman
BlurryEdge Strategies
415-627-8512
gelman@blurryedge.com
http://blurryedge.com
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 18:07:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:27 UTC