- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:13:23 -0700
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
er, sorry, I responded to a completely different topic ... not enough sleep (or the halloween haunt soundtrack drove me nuts last night). ....Roy On Oct 30, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Oct 30, 2011, at 11:38 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: > >> In short, none of the above solutions seems workable from my viewpoint. > > I agree. I also don't think that any of them are necessary. If a website > wishes to distinguish between resources that act as a third party and > resources that act as a first party, then it can use different URIs for > them (just as they normally do). > > I don't think we need to worry about accidental or deliberate transclusion > by an unrelated website, which would turn the first party resource into > a theoretical third-party resource. If any cross-site tracking occurs in > that situation, it will be the fault of the unrelated website. > > ....Roy
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 16:16:40 UTC