W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > November 2011

Re: User intended interactions [1st & 3rd Parties]

From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:58:17 -0500
Message-Id: <80A231DB-2FEE-4BCC-8979-20AB45B39D44@opera.com>
Cc: Tom Lowenthal <tom@mozilla.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
To: Kevin Smith <kevsmith@adobe.com>
Kevin, 

I agree with the comments about what the "user is thinking".
Not testable in any way. That said:

Le 10 nov. 2011 à 19:51, Kevin Smith a écrit :
> I would recommend rewriting 7 as:
> 7. The user visits a site. There is a weather widget with no obvious branding or clear indication that the widget is not operated by and part of the site that they are visiting.  The user clicks on the widget to scroll forward and see tomorrow's weather. The widget is at all times a third party.


Would you clarify what do you mean by "no obvious branding or clear indication".
because that would not work either with accessibility requirements, if you meant 
visual cues for the branding. Our documents would have a bad review from 
Protocols & Formats Working Group by excluding some categories of users. 

What about something such as

    7. The user visits a site. There is a weather widget with no
    accessible (in a wcag way) indication that the widget is not
    operated by and part of the site that they are visiting. The
    user clicks on the widget to scroll forward and see
    tomorrow's weather. The widget is at all times a third
    party.


-- 
Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 19:59:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 21 June 2013 10:11:22 UTC