W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > November 2011

RE: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests

From: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:59:45 -0700
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
CC: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <63294A1959410048A33AEE161379C8023D039584D4@SP2-EX07VS02.ds.corp.yahoo.com>

I'm not suggest we stop discussing anything - but rather - only suggesting a frame of context that we hold the discussion within.  The group started discussing DNT in the context of 1st and 3rd party and I'm recommending we hold to that.  Nothing more...

- Shane

-----Original Message-----
From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 2:57 PM
To: Shane Wiley
Cc: David Wainberg; public-tracking@w3.org; Jonathan Mayer
Subject: Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests


On Thursday 03 November 2011 13:06:51 Shane Wiley wrote:
> which is "where is the DNT signal expected to be respected?".

David Singer put it this way during the meeting: The user sends you "do not 
track me" and expects you to just do that. That doesn't mean for me, that we 
should stop to discuss what it means ..

Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 22:01:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:42 UTC