W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Move to close ISSUE-4

From: Rob van Eijk <rob@blaeu.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:18:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4EF9D3D3.8050001@blaeu.com>
To: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org> 
On 12/20/2011 8:04 PM, Sid Stamm wrote:
> David,
>
> My impression is "not enabled" in this context does *not* mean "DNT: 0". I think it means there is no HTTP header sent with requests. So yeah, "not stated" is the same as "not enabled".
>
> Should we make it clearer?  Does it make sense to settle on "not enabled" to mean no header and "enabled but opt-in" or something as "DNT: 0"?
>
> -Sid
>
>
Sid, David,

Since DNT is tri-state, maybe it makes more sense to settle on "not 
defined".

--
Rob
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2011 14:19:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 December 2011 14:19:35 GMT