W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking-international@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Agenda: Global considerations F2F meeting 11-12 Berlin

From: David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:13:40 -0500
Message-ID: <512BC5F4.6000708@networkadvertising.org>
To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
CC: Haakon Bratsberg <haakonfb@opera.com>, public-tracking-international@w3.org
Rigo,

On 2/25/13 1:11 PM, Rigo Wenning wrote:
> Definition of DNT:0 needs a clear extensible object. So this mainly is a
> discussion about the definition of DNT:0. I have changed it to say that
> now.
While I do understand the virtue of having a discussion about how DNT 
may fit into any current for future regulatory regimes in the EU, I 
definitely do not understand the need to define DNT:0. Why is it not NOT 
DNT:1?

-David
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 20:14:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 25 February 2013 20:14:11 GMT