- From: David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:13:40 -0500
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- CC: Haakon Bratsberg <haakonfb@opera.com>, public-tracking-international@w3.org
Rigo, On 2/25/13 1:11 PM, Rigo Wenning wrote: > Definition of DNT:0 needs a clear extensible object. So this mainly is a > discussion about the definition of DNT:0. I have changed it to say that > now. While I do understand the virtue of having a discussion about how DNT may fit into any current for future regulatory regimes in the EU, I definitely do not understand the need to define DNT:0. Why is it not NOT DNT:1? -David
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 20:14:10 UTC