W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking-international@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Global considerations F2F meeting 11-12 Berlin

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:23:44 +0100
To: public-tracking-international@w3.org
Cc: 'Thomas Roessler - W3C' <tlr@w3.org>, Kimon Zorbas <vp@iabeurope.eu>, Bill Scannell <bill@scannell.org>
Message-ID: <6914194.MaWAanJ0mM@hegel.sophia.w3.org>
Now, please register if you want to attend the F2F meeting by filling 
out the following WBS Form: 

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/49311/tpwgglobalberlin2013/

For planning reasons, please do so as soon as possible. As soon as I 
have more details on the location I will update you. I have some 
suggestions for the Agenda, but so far I have only very few feedback. 
This few will make the Agenda, if you do not have your own suggestions

 --Rigo

On Thursday 14 February 2013 03:12:55 Rigo Wenning wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> thanks to Frank, we have a room now at the Telekom Labs in Berlin.
> Please don't hesitate to send me agenda items if you don't want to end
> up with a Rigo's Agenda only.
> 
> On Monday 04 February 2013 16:03:38 Rigo Wenning wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > we had 11-13 March as target dates. I heard Viney complain and argue
> > against 12-13 March, but 11-12 would work. We only need a big
> > maximun
> > of one and a half day.
> > 
> > So my suggestion is to fix the date now for 11-12 March in Berlin.
> > The Agenda (to be detailed) will not start before noon, so
> > everybody can arrive in the morning (even those from abroad with
> > the earlier planes)
> > 
> > It looks like Kimon still has trouble securing a room for the
> > meeting, so I started a backup-plan as W3C has offices in Berlin
> > (via DFKI). I'm currently investigating those. There are still
> > other
> > possibilities.
> > 
> > So unless I hear loud complaints until tomorrow EOB, the meeting
> > will
> > be 11-12 March in Berlin. Details for room and agenda will follow.
> > The main points of the Agenda that are relevant to the discussion of
> > our specifications are already in my introduction email:
> > 
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking-
> > international/2012Nov/0000.html
> > 
> > If we want to, we could additionally talk about the TPWG's relation
> > to the ongoing discussion about the new EU privacy regulation and
> > what it means for us.
> > 
> > Also, the javascript API has to be scrutinized whether it works for
> > the goals we want to achieve in a regulated environment.
> > 
> > Of course, additional suggestions for the agenda are welcome.
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Rigo
Received on Monday, 18 February 2013 12:24:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 18 February 2013 12:24:11 GMT