CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts

Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory gil:/tmp/cvs-serv9860/drafts

Modified Files:
	tracking-dnt.html 
Log Message:
user agent, not user-agent, unless we are talking about the User-Agent header field

--- /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html	2013/10/02 05:38:49	1.223
+++ /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html	2013/10/02 08:37:47	1.224
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@
         designed to add a tracking preference expression,
         or make a choice for privacy that then implicitly includes a
         tracking preference (e.g., <q>Privacy settings: high</q>).
-        The user-agent might ask the user for their preference during startup,
+        The user agent might ask the user for their preference during startup,
         perhaps on first use or after an update adds the tracking protection
         feature. Likewise, a user might install or configure a proxy to add
         the expression to their own outgoing requests.
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@
           extension characters as possible.
         </p>
         <p class="note">This document does not have any implied or specified
-          behavior for the user-agent treatment of cookies when DNT is enabled.
+          behavior for the user agent treatment of cookies when DNT is enabled.
         </p>
         <p class="note">The HTTP specification [[!HTTP11]] permits multiple headers 
         with the same field-name only under restricted circumstances which do 
@@ -1555,7 +1555,7 @@
              assumed – see <a href="#exceptions-no-js" class="sectionRef"></a>.)
            </p>
            <p>
-             The user-agent MAY provide interfaces to the user:
+             The user agent MAY provide interfaces to the user:
              <ul>
               <li>To indicate that a call to store an exception has just been made;
               <li>To allow the user to confirm a user-granted exception prior to 
@@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@
           </p>
           <p>
             The calls cause the following steps to occur (subject to user 
-            confirmation of the exception, if the user-agent asks for it):
+            confirmation of the exception, if the user agent asks for it):
           </p>
           <ul>
             <li>The UA adds to its local database one or
@@ -1697,7 +1697,7 @@
 		 <p>
 		  User-agents MUST handle each API request as a 'unit', granting
 		  and maintaining it in its entirety, or not at all. That means
-		  that a user-agent MUST NOT indicate to a site that a request for
+		  that a user agent MUST NOT indicate to a site that a request for
 		  targets {a, b, c} exists in the database, and later remove only one or
 		  two of {a, b, c} from its logical database of remembered grants.
 		  This assures sites that the set of sites they need for
@@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@
 		</p>
          <div class="note">
             <p>
-              It is left up to individual user-agent implementations how to
+              It is left up to individual user agent implementations how to
               determine and how and whether to store users' tracking
               preferences.
             </p>
@@ -1715,7 +1715,7 @@
               their names might mean little to the user. The user might, for
               example, be told that there is a stored exception for a specific set 
               of sites on such-and-such top-level origin, rather than listing them 
-              by name; or the user-agent may decide to store, and show to the user,
+              by name; or the user agent may decide to store, and show to the user,
               a site-wide exception, effectively ignoring the list of
               domain names, if supplied.
             </p>
@@ -1792,7 +1792,7 @@
           </p>
           <p>
             If the list <code>arrayOfDomainStrings</code> is supplied, the
-            user-agent MAY choose to store a site-wide
+            user agent MAY choose to store a site-wide
             exception. If it does so it MUST indicate
             this in the return value.
           </p>
@@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@
           <p class="note">
             The prior version of this call was asynchronous with a call-back; the change
             to require the site to determine the user's wishes, rather than the UA,
-            enabled this to become synchronous.  This is simpler; the user-agent may 
+            enabled this to become synchronous.  This is simpler; the user agent may 
             still ask for the user's approval. Sites wishing to know whether an 
             exception stands, or the DNT header that they would receive,
             should call the appropriate enquiry API.
@@ -1945,7 +1945,7 @@
           </p>
           <p>
             If the list <code>arrayOfDomainStrings</code> is supplied, and the
-            user-agent stores only site-wide exceptions, then the user-agent
+            user agent stores only site-wide exceptions, then the user agent
             MUST match by confirming a site-wide exception.
           </p>
           <p>
@@ -1956,26 +1956,26 @@
             the duplet in the logical model.
           </p>
           <p>
-            If the user-agent stores explicit lists, and the call includes one, the
+            If the user agent stores explicit lists, and the call includes one, the
             database is checked for the existence of all the duplets (one per target):
           </p>
           <pre>[document-origin, target]</pre>
 
           <p>
-            If the user-agent stores only site-wide exceptions or the call did
+            If the user agent stores only site-wide exceptions or the call did
             not include an explicit list, the database is checked for the 
             single duplet:
           </p>
           <pre>[document-origin, * ]</pre>
           <p>
-            If the user-agent stores explicit lists, and the call includes one,
+            If the user agent stores explicit lists, and the call includes one,
             and the <code>domain</code> argument is provided and is not empty then the
             database is checked for the existence of all the duplets (one per target):
           </p>
           <pre>[*.domain, target]</pre>
 
           <p>
-            If the user-agent stores only site-wide exceptions or the call did
+            If the user agent stores only site-wide exceptions or the call did
             not include an explicit list, and the <code>domain</code> argument is
             provided and is not empty then the database is checked for the single
             duplet:
@@ -2080,7 +2080,7 @@
 			first party will not necessarily know in advance whether a known third party 
 			will use some other third parties.</p>
 
-		<p>If a user-agent sends a tracking exception to a given combination of origin 
+		<p>If a user agent sends a tracking exception to a given combination of origin 
 			server and a named third party, the user agent will send DNT:0 to that named 
 			third party. By receiving the DNT:0 header, the named third party acquires 
 			the permission to track the user agent and collect the data and process it 
@@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@
 			The tracking permission request triggered 
 			by the origin server is thus granted to the named third party and its 
 			sub-services. This is even true for sub-services that would normally receive a 
-			DNT:1 web-wide preference from the user-agent if the user agent  
+			DNT:1 web-wide preference from the user agent if the user agent  
 			interacted with this service directly.</p>
 		
 		<p>For advertisement networks this typically would mean that the collection and 
@@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@
           the exception until the user approves. Some agents might provide a
           user-interface to see and edit the database of recorded exception grants.
           The API parameters siteName, explanationString, and detailURI are
-          provided so that the user-agent may use them in their user interface.
+          provided so that the user agent may use them in their user interface.
         </p>
         <p>
           A user agent that chooses to highlight when tracking exceptions have been 
@@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@
         </p>
 
         <p>
-          In some user-agent implementations, decisions to grant exceptions
+          In some user agent implementations, decisions to grant exceptions
           may have been made in the past (and since forgotten) or may have
           been made by other users of the device. Thus, exceptions may not
           always represent the current preferences of the user. Some user
@@ -2227,7 +2227,7 @@
           test for the existence of
           <code>storeSiteSpecificTrackingException</code> before calling
           the method. If an exception is granted in this context and the
-          user-agent stores that preference, a user agent may send a DNT:0
+          user agent stores that preference, a user agent may send a DNT:0
           header even if a tracking preference isn't expressed for other
           requests. Persisted preferences MAY also affect which header is
           transmitted if a user later chooses to express a tracking
@@ -2254,7 +2254,7 @@
 		<p>The 'Store' calls do not have a return value, and return immediately.  
 		 If there is a problem with the calling parameters, then a Javascript 
 		 exception will be raised.  
-		 In addition, it may be that the user-agent does not immediately store 
+		 In addition, it may be that the user agent does not immediately store 
 		 the exception, possibly because it is allowing the user to confirm. 
 		 Even though the site has acquired the user's informed consent before 
 		 calling the 'Store' API, it is possible that the user will change 
@@ -2267,7 +2267,7 @@
 		</p>
 
 		<p>Sites can call the 'Confirm' APIs to enquire whether a specific 
-		 exception has been granted and stands in the user-agent. This is the call 
+		 exception has been granted and stands in the user agent. This is the call 
 		 to make to determine whether the exception exists, and hence to control 
 		 access to the function or operation;  if it fails (the exception has been 
 		 deleted, or not yet granted), then the user is ideally again offered 

Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 08:37:49 UTC