W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking-commit@w3.org > August 2012

WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts tracking-dnt.html,1.134,1.135

From: Matthias Schunter via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:36:40 +0000
To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1SxKrg-0006Rg-G5@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv24625

Modified Files:
	tracking-dnt.html 
Log Message:
closed ISSUE-129 (site wide) and ISSUE-130 (web-wide)

Index: tracking-dnt.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html,v
retrieving revision 1.134
retrieving revision 1.135
diff -u -d -r1.134 -r1.135
--- tracking-dnt.html	3 Aug 2012 16:32:32 -0000	1.134
+++ tracking-dnt.html	3 Aug 2012 16:36:38 -0000	1.135
@@ -1766,12 +1766,6 @@
           trust without visiting that site.
         </p>
 
-          <p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/129">ISSUE-129</a>: Should a blanket exception of the type ["firstparty", "*"] be possible?<br>
-            <b>PROPOSAL</b>: In this section
-          </p>
-          <p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/130">ISSUE-130</a>: Should a global exception for a given third party on all sites be supported? <br>
-            <b>PROPOSAL</b>: In this section
-          </p>
           <p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/140">ISSUE-140</a>: Do we need site-specific exceptions, i.e., concrete list of permitted third parties for a site?<br>
             <b>PROPOSAL</b>: In this section; yes, as some sites may have a mix of
             trusted/needed third parties, and others that either don't need to
Received on Friday, 3 August 2012 16:36:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 3 August 2012 16:36:41 GMT