- From: Matthias Schunter via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:36:40 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv24625
Modified Files:
tracking-dnt.html
Log Message:
closed ISSUE-129 (site wide) and ISSUE-130 (web-wide)
Index: tracking-dnt.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html,v
retrieving revision 1.134
retrieving revision 1.135
diff -u -d -r1.134 -r1.135
--- tracking-dnt.html 3 Aug 2012 16:32:32 -0000 1.134
+++ tracking-dnt.html 3 Aug 2012 16:36:38 -0000 1.135
@@ -1766,12 +1766,6 @@
trust without visiting that site.
</p>
- <p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/129">ISSUE-129</a>: Should a blanket exception of the type ["firstparty", "*"] be possible?<br>
- <b>PROPOSAL</b>: In this section
- </p>
- <p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/130">ISSUE-130</a>: Should a global exception for a given third party on all sites be supported? <br>
- <b>PROPOSAL</b>: In this section
- </p>
<p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/140">ISSUE-140</a>: Do we need site-specific exceptions, i.e., concrete list of permitted third parties for a site?<br>
<b>PROPOSAL</b>: In this section; yes, as some sites may have a mix of
trusted/needed third parties, and others that either don't need to
Received on Friday, 3 August 2012 16:36:41 UTC