- From: Matthias Schunter via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:29:04 +0000
- To: public-tracking-commit@w3.org
Update of /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv9504
Modified Files:
tracking-dnt.html
Log Message:
ISSUE 83 is now closed
Index: tracking-dnt.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /w3ccvs/WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-dnt.html,v
retrieving revision 1.131
retrieving revision 1.132
diff -u -d -r1.131 -r1.132
--- tracking-dnt.html 3 Aug 2012 16:23:14 -0000 1.131
+++ tracking-dnt.html 3 Aug 2012 16:29:02 -0000 1.132
@@ -328,7 +328,6 @@
adjust their behavior when no explicit preference is expressed via
this protocol.
</p>
- <p class='issue'><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/59">ISSUE-59</a>: Should the first party be informed about whether the user has sent a DNT header to third parties on their site?</p>
<p class='issue'><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/111">ISSUE-111</a>: Different DNT value to signify existence of site-specific exception (also linked to <a href="#dnt-header-field">4.1</a> and <a href="#exceptions">6</a> below</a>)</p>
</section>
@@ -1770,9 +1769,6 @@
trust without visiting that site.
</p>
- <p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/83">ISSUE-83</a>: How do you opt out if already opted in?<br>
- <b>PROPOSAL</b>: In this section
- </p>
<p class="issue"><a href="http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/129">ISSUE-129</a>: Should a blanket exception of the type ["firstparty", "*"] be possible?<br>
<b>PROPOSAL</b>: In this section
</p>
Received on Friday, 3 August 2012 16:29:05 UTC