Re: Mapping DNT to GDPR

Hmmm…

I find your comments confusing especially in light of the WG call today - reviewing the agenda it seems that you are indeed focusing on regional laws with items 1, 6 and 7 and how they will apply to the CR and future revs.

As Shane points out (I’m in agreement): The devil in the detail (TPE) will be how Publishers make this available to users such that is meets the parity requirement (UX is not defined by the TPE). The CR needs to explain how the ‘detail’ can be applied.

Maybe we should just all wait until you ‘ship’ the CR version.


WG Agenda for October 23.

1) ePrivacy amendments - first impressions?

Mike, maybe you can give us some help how to read this?
http://www.w3.org/mid/2b9e01d34913$c36e2c20$4a4a8460$@baycloud.com



6) Issue 60

Purpose Level Preferences
https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/60

7) Issue 65

DNT:1 extension for audience measurement (EU ePR)
https://github.com/w3c/dnt/issues/65


Cheers,


Peter

Peter Cranstone
CEO, 3PHealth

COMS:
Mobile/Signal: +1 - <tel:303-246-9954> 303-809-7342<tel:303-246-9954> UTC -6hrs
Skype: cranstone
Website | www.3phealth.com<http://www.3phealth.com>  (Healthcare Patient Engagement and Data Interoperability)
Website | www.3pmobile.com<http://www.3pmobile.com> (Privacy by Design Platform for GDPR and ePrivacy reg.)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of such information is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments and destroy any copies thereof. Thank you.





On Oct 23, 2017, at 11:04 AM, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com<mailto:fielding@gbiv.com>> wrote:

Everyone,

The purpose of this list (public-tracking-comments) is to receive public comments
on the specification in CR.  It is not for discussing WG business or making proposals
for WG consideration.  It is certainly not for discussing regional laws: do that on
the privacy interest group lists.


Cheers,

Roy T. Fielding                     <http://roy.gbiv.com/>
Senior Principal Scientist, Adobe   <https://www.adobe.com/>