Re: Moving VTT to a new WD, reviewing disposition of old comments and new GH issues, Please Review

Dave,

It would be worth mentioning (perhaps again) how the CG's dispositions
will be carried to the WG and what the process will be there.

Kind regards,

Nigel


On 17/04/2017, 23:59, "David Singer" <singer@mac.com> wrote:

>Folks
>
>1. the Świde reviewą page
><https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebVTT_Wide_Review#Review_Requests_and_Responses>
> documents the disposition of all comments received in wide review except
>two:
>* I-5, incomplete ruby: we will document that <rb> support is required (a
>normal part of ruby) and leave rtc and rbc to future (and rp unmentioned
>as itąs about HTML)
>* C-8, proposed text to select by region on the way
>
>We closed:
>* I-12: more formal grammar. We prefer to keep the formal text to the
>parsing rules, and provide a separate informative authoring guide (which
>is on the wiki)
>* C-7: we canąt make the proposed change without risking confusion
>between cue identifiers and region identifiers
>
>*** With these four resolutions, do you (community group) agree with the
>disposition? *** I will take silence as consent, but some positive
>responses appreciated.
>
>
>2. The test suite is in much better shape and we have filed an fixed some
>ambiguities etc. that developing it showed.  Please try the test suite
>and comment!
>
>3.  New issues weąd need to resolve before shipping out a new wide review
>and, I hope, a CR.  I donąt see any in the list of 30 open that need
>immediate attention; do you?
><https://github.com/w3c/webvtt/issues>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Dave Singer
>
>singer@mac.com
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2017 10:32:05 UTC