- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:40:11 -0800
- To: public-texttracks@w3.org
- Cc: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebVTT_Wide_Review > On Nov 14, 2016, at 16:10 , David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > Notably remaining: > > 1. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28265 > > Feedback on what Ruby support is needed. Please tell us what you think. I have a suggested resolution in the bug (in both bugzilla and github). Summary: leave out rp (not needed), mention rb explicity (currently implicitly included), leave rbc and rtc to future > > 2. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28474 and https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28473 > > CSS Selectors; how do we want to resolve these. Comment, please? Otherwise I suggest the editors include the suggested selectors (see the relayed message from Bert Bos). > > 3. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28258 > > A request for a formal grammar, which I think we’ll simply defer. Simon thought maybe railroad diagrams; I am wondering if we can simply link to the intro that was on webplatform and that I have moved to the Wiki? (I think an informative link to this from the spec. would be helpful.) I moved the authoring guide to the Wiki. I suggest we provide an informative link to it and defer this bug. I also drafted a Security and Privacy Considerations section. I assume we can include that and iterate on it. I’d like to ask the editors to * do the minor ruby edit (mention rb) * include the security and privacy considerations * add the selectors recommended by CSS (perhaps) * add a section for ‘features at risk’ but don’t populate it yet * add the informative link to the authoring guide and then we’ll ask for WG approval for this disposition, and do a fast second wide-review, populate the ‘at risk’ section, and ask for CR. Agreed? > > > > Then, on <https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebVTT_Wide_Review#Implementations> I classified all the bugs and entered up the CG disposition status, except for these 4. Tell me if you disagree with any (or even edit the wiki). > > I really want to get these resolved; then to the WG for their comment; then to ask Thierry both to give the feedback to the commenters, and to initiate a short second wide review and then request a CR transition. > > Small amounts to do; let’s do it. > > > > > > > David Singer > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc. > David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 18:41:07 UTC