public-texttracks@w3.org from February 2015 by author

Andreas Tai

• Re: Response to call for public review of WebVTT FPWD (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Fwd: Response to call for public review of WebVTT FPWD (Tuesday, 17 February)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 28074] [WebVTT] Link up mention of "region" in text position definition (Saturday, 28 February)
• [Bug 28105] New: Should the rendering area be the video element or the video box within? (Thursday, 26 February)
• [Bug 28098] New: "Text track region" concepts should be renamed "WebVTT region" (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [Bug 28087] New: Vertical text is the wrong way around by default (Tuesday, 24 February)
• [Bug 28075] New: Add a visual representation of region anchoring (Sunday, 22 February)
• [Bug 28074] New: Link up mention of "region" in text position definition (Sunday, 22 February)
• [Bug 28073] New: Rename "line position" to something more appropriate? (Sunday, 22 February)
• [Bug 28072] New: Consistent use of snap-to-lines flag (Sunday, 22 February)
• [Bug 28071] New: The concept of line position is unnecessarily used when writing direction is introduced (Sunday, 22 February)
• [Bug 28070] New: Title of 3.1 should be "WebVTT cues" (Sunday, 22 February)
• [Bug 17483] WebVTT: Don't overlap cues that don't fit (Sunday, 22 February)
• [Bug 27937] Omissions from the VTTCue interface in the API (Sunday, 1 February)
• [Bug 27939] Omissions from the VTTCue interface in the API (Sunday, 1 February)

David Singer

• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Response to call for public review of WebVTT FPWD (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Monday, 23 February)
• Fwd: WebVTT Horizontal writing direction (Wednesday, 4 February)

Eric Carlson

• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)

Frank Olivier

• RE: Implementation Status [via Web Media Text Tracks Community Group] (Wednesday, 25 February)

Fredrik Söderquist

• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)

Glenn Adams

• Re: Conversion of 608/708 captions to WebVTT - how to map the colour green (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Conversion of 608/708 captions to WebVTT - how to map the colour green (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Conversion of 608/708 captions to WebVTT - how to map the colour green (Wednesday, 25 February)

Michael Borthwick

• Re: Conversion of 608/708 captions to WebVTT - how to map the colour green (Saturday, 21 February)

Nigel Megitt

• Re: Conversion of 608/708 captions to WebVTT - how to map the colour green (Wednesday, 25 February)
• HbbTV 2.0 Spec published (Tuesday, 10 February)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: Implementation Status [via Web Media Text Tracks Community Group] (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Conversion of 608/708 captions to WebVTT - how to map the colour green (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Conversion of 608/708 captions to WebVTT - how to map the colour green (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: Implementation Status [via Web Media Text Tracks Community Group] (Thursday, 26 February)
• RE: Implementation Status [via Web Media Text Tracks Community Group] (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Response to call for public review of WebVTT FPWD (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Inband styling (was Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Response to call for public review of WebVTT FPWD (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Vtt subtitles and karaoke style - by nino (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: VTT/CSS (was RE: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT) (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Conversion of 608/708 captions to WebVTT - how to map the colour green (Saturday, 21 February)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Evidence of 'Wide Review' needed for VTT (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: Implementation Status [via Web Media Text Tracks Community Group] (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: Fwd: WebVTT Horizontal writing direction (Thursday, 5 February)

W3C Community Development Team

• Implementation Status [via Web Media Text Tracks Community Group] (Sunday, 22 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2015 06:16:11 UTC