On 23 May 2013 16:33, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:29:38 +0200, Cyril Concolato > > <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote: > >> Le 22/05/2013 14:50, Simon Pieters a écrit : > >> Lots of people think "valid" means "handled (in one way or another) by a > >> parser". > > > > I agree. > > As I mentioned in OP it would be nice if the WebVTT specification > flagged syntax errors in the parser. My parser implementation could be > used as a guidance if you want to go down that route (I do exactly > that to implement the validator bit). > Yup I think that's a good idea. I'm happy for patches, btw: am fully aware of being behind on editing... Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 22:46:05 UTC