- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 18:38:13 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- cc: public-texttracks@w3.org
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > Yup, fair enough. So we'd put TextTrackCue still into the HTML spec, but > move WebVTTCue and everything else WebVTT specific into a WebVTT > extension specification for HTML? It wouldn't be an extension specification for HTML, it'd just be WebVTT, no? The more specs we have the more complicated things are. We should really just have one spec, or, for sanity, one spec per editor. Splitting things into more specs than we have editors is just confusing. > I've got a script creating the current WebVTT spec from the source file. > I assume we'd move all WebVTT related things out? I can start preparing > this and when we're happy with it, we can remove it from source ? On the HTML side I'll split the WebVTT parts of the TextTrackCue interface out, and then in a separate commit remove the WebVTT parts. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 18:38:39 UTC