Re: Spec formatting from Silvia Pfeiffer on 2013-06-17 (public-texttracks@w3.org from June 2013)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:22:06 +1000
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>, "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=ysj0pa0MPfF78J0vS_Dcdmc_-YMWe3Aicg_-S5S0=+A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:
> On 6/15/13 2:19 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Glenn,
>>
>> The move towards the ReSpec is on purpose - it's the baseline for CG
>> specs.
>
>
> There's no requirement or anything that CG specs use ReSpec.

When I took over editing from Ian, it was recommended to me, since I
had to cut the text out of the HTML spec and had to create a new
publishing pipeline. Also, it's what other CGs use and it has a
configuration for CG boilerplate.

Silvia.

Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 07:22:57 UTC