- From: Ralph Giles <giles@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:47:30 -0800
- To: Lawrence Forooghian <lawrence.forooghian@saffrondigital.com>
- CC: "public-texttracks@w3.org" <public-texttracks@w3.org>
On 13-01-16 9:27 AM, Lawrence Forooghian wrote: > If you look at the second cue (x = 00:44.000), then the first cue is a cue > whose start time is less than x (it's 00:00.000), however x is not greater > than or equal to the end time offset of the first cue (which is 01:24.000). I think you're right. The intention is that the cues be sortable into a hierarchy with no cues at level n falling outside the interval of any cue at level n-1. As stated, the rule is too strict to allow that, because any nesting creates a pair where this relation is true only in one direction. -r
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2013 19:47:59 UTC