- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 03:05:56 +0000
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <foolip@google.com>, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>, "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
This all looks reasonable to me.
On 9/22/17, 7:31 PM, "Philip Jägenstedt" <foolip@google.com> wrote:
On "unification", here's what I summarized as a compromise in a private exchange with Florian:
* Unversioned directories. Under css/ to make the lint rules simpler, or in the root with a few more lines of lint logic, doesn't matter.
* Keep requiring <link rel=help> for CSS WG stuff.
* Don't require links to specific spec sections if upstreaming new tests in bulk, because then it just won't happen.
* Encourage versioned spec links in documentation, but don't require it, it's easy to fix in bulk on spec level bump.
Received on Saturday, 23 September 2017 03:06:21 UTC