Re: How to do issue triage in web-platform-tests?

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:14 AM James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk> wrote:

> On 14/09/17 12:57, Bob Holt wrote:
> > Re: labels, and building on James's suggestions I propose:
> > - priority:urgent
> > - priority:roadmap
> > - priority:backlog
>
> That seems reasonable to me. Agreed that prioritisation is hard without
> some way to ensure that people actually work on the prioritized things,
> but hopefully we have enough regular contributors — including people who
> are paid to work on this — and good enough cooperation to make it happen.
>

This all sounds good to me, and not doing anything with milestones at this
point simplifies things. I expect that for most issues with
priority:roadmap, they'll be tracked by some external process, like Google
OKRs and similar.

I'd like to add these labels and go ahead to start with a triage of all
infra issues, as part of the ecosystem infra rotation
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/10och6DoxEe6AhQX7MiQR8AhtjDheKIlf-GpF0impeJQ/edit?usp=sharing>
.

If there are no concerns in 24 hours, let's do it!