Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Re: Stability testing of PRs

Oh dear.   I didn't know about that restriction.

Aren't most submitters working from forks?  And shouldn't they be?

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:16 PM, James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>
wrote:

> On 22/10/16 10:41, James Graham wrote:
>
> The script was failing for some reason on a number of PRs (invalid
>> responses from GitHub, mostly). I've just pushed a commit that moves
>> most of the logic into python which I hope will be more robust, or at
>> least easier to debug if things go wrong.
>>
>> Please rebase your failing PRs on to master so that they run with the
>> latest changes.
>>
>
> OK, this is still a little broken. I had forgotten that for rather obvious
> security reasons, travis doesn't share encrypted environment variables with
> PRs from forks. I'll try to think of a solution for this that doesn't make
> the experience for submitters working in forks too terrible.
>
>
>


-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops