Re: Adding tools to the collection

Thanks!  I think we can attempt this process.  Man, I hate it when I am
breaking new ground!

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Shane,
>
> Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, 2016-04-23 14:44 -0500:
> > Archived-At: <
> http://www.w3.org/mid/CAJdbnOC305k8cHYPQCrCzv-p-ta+57Aoq-jYArL9VxQTcdfvkA@mail.gmail.com
> >
> >
> > So - the other day I asked about Web Annotation testing via WPT and the
> > consensus seemed to be that was fine.  The advice was also to add any
> > "tooling" to wpt-tools.  That makes sense to me.  My question is "Is
> there
> > a process for doing PRs that include a repository and a sub-repository?"
>
> There isn’t, as far as I’m aware of. The process is to create forks for
> each repo, and separate PRs, and in the wpt PR, just note that it depends
> on PR from the wpt-tools fork.
>
> > And on a related note, is there a document somewhere that talks about how
> > to have a fork of wpt-tools integrated as a sub-module of a fork of WPT
> > itself?  'cause that feels above my pay grade!
>
> There is not, as far as I know. Of the top of my head, I guess the way it
> would need to be handled is:
>
>   1. In your wpt PR, you would need to edit the .gitmodules file to point
>      to your fork of wpt-tools.
>
>   2. After both the PRs are reviewed, the wpt-tools PR would need to be
>      merged first.
>
>   3. Finally, the wpt PR, before merging, would need to be updated to point
>      to the updated canonical wpt-tools rather than your fork.
>
>   —Mike
>
> --
> Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
>



-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops