Re: Mismatch between CSS and web-platform-tests semantics for reftests

On 19/08/14 11:01, James Graham wrote:

> Do we know how necessary the more complex setup is? In particular I
> think that the main distinguishing feature is the ability to specify
> multiple references of which *any* may match (since the all must match
> semantic is just a way of collapsing N tests down to a single test). Is
> there a list of all tests that are using this feature?

Also, do we know if any automation software supports the CSS features?
It obviously isn't impossible to implement, but it would substantially
complicate the implementation.

Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 10:04:31 UTC