- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:48:45 +0200
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- CC: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, public-test-infra@w3.org
On 19/04/2013 15:24 , Tobie Langel wrote: > On Friday, April 19, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: >> On 19/04/2013 13:04 , Ms2ger wrote: >>>> DOMEvents -> DOM-Level-3-Events html -> html5 domxpath -> >>>> DOM-Level-3-XPath >>> >>> >>> I object to introducing version numbers into the names, for all >>> the reasons we had to decide not the introduce them in the first >>> place. >> >> So the above are the ones that apply to this objection. If we pick >> alternative names, we can simply ask to get a TR redirection for >> those, I think. >> >> It might be a good idea to reclaim /TR/html/ for something sensible >> in any case :) > > I don't mind holding on to change those directories to something more > reasonable, but that implies fixing /TR. Who volunteers? I can ask for the shortnames. What do we want? html dom-events dom-xpath ? I can't promise we'll get them, though. There might be a middle ground compromise where we get "html" but not the others. It might not matter if there is no new DOM XPath (extremely likely) and if DOM Events move to DOM (which is the case in the WHATWG document at least). For the latter, that would move the content of dom-events to dom. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 13:48:53 UTC