W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Repository layout

From: Linss, Peter <peter.linss@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:50:55 +0000
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
CC: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EDAD18FF-6F6C-432B-BA78-A1FEA9661042@hp.com>

On May 31, 2012, at 4:38 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:

> (snip)
> 
> <bryan> I like the idea of using metadata to track which tests have been approved. The test framework could then offer the option of running a specific test, all submitted tests, or only approved ones. This would enable the review process by making it easier to execute tests and provide feedback directly through the test framework (e.g. when running a test singly, after the test executes the tester could rate the test quality, and that can be captured along with the test result).

That's not a bad idea. I'll add listing test status in the manifest files to my to do list.

Peter
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 13:51:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 1 June 2012 13:51:45 GMT