W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Repository layout

From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:22:29 +0200
Message-ID: <4FC8B405.6010500@opera.com>
To: public-test-infra@w3.org
On 06/01/2012 02:01 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> On May 31, 2012, at 16:15 , James Graham wrote:
>>> Overall I agree that the approval step is a bureaucratic speed bump
>>> that is not being helpful. I think that we should move to a
>>> commit-then-review model in which people who have an interest in
>>> passing a test suite can file bugs against broken tests. Ideally, we
>>> would make flagging broken tests easy  I'm thinking about ways of
>>> doing that in the framework (suggestions welcome  I wonder if I
>>> could just add a flag to "reported as broken" test cases).
>>
>> Make it possible to link to bug reports?
>
> Are you thinking of something like<link rel='bug' href='URL of bug report'>? I think that would work for me.
>

I meant in the metadata. I don't see why you would want to link to a bug 
about a test inside a test, really.
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 12:25:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 1 June 2012 12:25:34 GMT