Great. Thank you! Simon On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote: > The steps for taking a draft to FPWD are documented here: > > http://goo.gl/bbzqu > > The first step really is that the group needs to formally record a > resolution to proceed to FPWD. That can be done by having the Wilhelm (the > chair) send out a "Call for Consensus" message to the group, with a > deadline for comments (usually 1 week). Some recent examples: > > CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0784.html > > CfC: publish FPWD of Input Method Editor (IME); deadline May 9 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0474.html > > Once that deadline has passed, if there are no objections to the FPWD Call > for Consensus, Wilhelm sends a Transition Request message to plh asking > linking to the Call for Consensus message and asking for approval of the > shortname. > > I'll work with Wilhelm to get this all started. > > --Mike > > Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, 2012-05-24 17:04 +0200: > > > On 05/24/2012 04:50 PM, Simon Stewart wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >So, according to my understanding, we need to get consensus in this > group > > >and approval from the domain lead (Wilhelm, presumably). Is there > anyone on > > >this list who doesn't feel we should move to FPWD? I'm all for it. > > > > Per <http://www.w3.org/Interaction/>, the domain lead is plh. He will > need > > to approve the shortname ("webdriver"?). > > > > HTH > > Ms2ger > > > > > > > > -- > Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike >Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 09:20:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 May 2012 09:20:37 GMT