W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sysapps@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Updated plans for face to face meeting, and results of questionnaire

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 11:30:46 +0000
To: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com>
CC: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D94DF726-780E-4560-BD17-135EA8A313BB@intel.com>
On 23 May 2014, at 12:02, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <kenneth.christiansen@gmail.com> wrote:

> I wonder why Idle (power management, keep the display on etc) has so little interest. There is a lot of developer interest in that, judging from feedback on mailing lists etc, and we definitely need something like that in Crosswalk/Tizen (we have a Tizen extension today).

Indeed there’s interest toward the “keep the display on” API in the wider web community. However, this poll was aimed at the SysApps’ group participants, so it does not necessarily reflect the interests of the wider community.

And actually, I think the Idle API entry in the poll derived from the SysApps Charter is backwards: “an API to be notified when the user is idle”.

Have you seen demand for this type of API as well?

Specifically to the “keep the display on” API, the current sentiment seems to be it should go to either the Device APIs or to the HTML WG. There’s good momentum building behind that deliverable.


Received on Friday, 23 May 2014 11:31:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:36:20 UTC