W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sysapps@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Next step of task scheduler API spec

From: Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk73@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 02:31:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKmBCi1_dubUe_N0yp0d=LcMm3pa9wqcnMPppYJ=iWY702z=FQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christophe Dumez <ch.dumez@samsung.com>
Cc: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
Hi. Chris and Marcos.
Thanks for quick reply!

When is proper timing to integrate task scheduler spec with ServiceWorker?
We already have FPWD for ServiceWorker. Is not enough to do integration
work?

Kr, Wonsuk.


2014-06-27 0:19 GMT+09:00 Christophe Dumez <ch.dumez@samsung.com>:

> Yes, Marcos is right.
> The specification is still based on "system messages" and the plan is to
> integrate with service workers instead.
>
>
> On 06/26/2014 11:13 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
>> On June 26, 2014 at 10:38:17 AM, Wonsuk Lee (wonsuk73@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi. Chris.
>>>>
>>> As far as I remember, task scheduler API spec[1] is almost ready
>>> for LC. Is it Right? If it is true, I would like to bring this spec
>>> to LC. Could you share your opinions on that?
>>>
>> It needs service worker integration.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcos Caceres
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Christophe Dumez - Samsung Research America
> Boston, MA
>
>
>


-- 

=========================================
   (Wonsuk, Lee) / Principal Engineer, Ph.D
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Co., LTD. (߲)
Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997
E-mail: wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com, wonsuk73@gmail.com
http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
-----------------------------------------
Inspire the World, Create the Future !!!
=========================================
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 17:31:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:36:20 UTC