Re: Next step of task scheduler API spec

Yes, Marcos is right.
The specification is still based on "system messages" and the plan is to 
integrate with service workers instead.

On 06/26/2014 11:13 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> On June 26, 2014 at 10:38:17 AM, Wonsuk Lee (wonsuk73@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> Hi. Chris.
>> As far as I remember, task scheduler API spec[1] is almost ready
>> for LC. Is it Right? If it is true, I would like to bring this spec
>> to LC. Could you share your opinions on that?
> It needs service worker integration.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Marcos Caceres
>
>
>

-- 
Christophe Dumez - Samsung Research America
Boston, MA

Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 15:19:47 UTC