Re: Next step of task scheduler API spec

Jungkee.
Do you have any update on your work for ServiceWorker? It would be
excellent if task scheduler spec can go to next step with
ServiceWorkerRegistration interface soon!

Kr, Wonsuk.


2014-07-22 13:53 GMT+09:00 Jungkee Song <jungkees@gmail.com>:

> On Jun 27, 2014 2:38 AM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
> >
> > On June 26, 2014 at 1:32:13 PM, Wonsuk Lee (wonsuk73@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > Hi. Chris and Marcos.
> > > Thanks for quick reply!
> > >
> > > When is proper timing to integrate task scheduler spec with
> ServiceWorker?
> > > We already have FPWD for ServiceWorker. Is not enough to do integration
> > > work?
> >
> > Never too late to start thinking about how to do it. Problem is that the
> underlying architecture for SW is unstable and unproven so the "right way"
> too hook in ScheduleTasks is still a bit unclear.
> >
>
> It seems this design has got a consensus:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0081.html
>
> I think I'll be able to get back with a section for the extension guide in
> the ServiceWorker spec in a few weeks.
>
> Note that ServiceWorkerRegistration interface in the sited discussion has
> not been added in the spec yet.
>
> > --
> > Marcos Caceres
> >
>



-- 

=========================================
ÀÌ ¿ø ¼® (Wonsuk, Lee) / Principal Engineer, Ph.D
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Co., LTD. (ß²àøï³í­)
Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997
E-mail: wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com, wonsuk73@gmail.com
http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
-----------------------------------------
Inspire the World, Create the Future !!!
=========================================

Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 15:30:27 UTC