RE: Tracing action items from previous F2F meeting

Marcos.
Thanks for quick reply!
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 2:00 AM
> To: Wonsuk Lee
> Cc: public-sysapps@w3.org; Mounir Lamouri
> Subject: Re: Tracing action items from previous F2F meeting
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Wonsuk Lee wrote:
> 
> > Hi. active members!
> > From Toronto F2F meeting, we have more than 10 action items as below. So
> I would like to know about current status of them. I hope if possible we
> have done this before upcoming F2F.
> >
> > -- Action items from the meeting, 27th Aug.
> >
> > From Action01 to Action03 belong to Marcos.
> 
> 
> > Action01: file a bug about maybe relaxing dependency on sniff [recorded
> in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-sysapps-minutes.html#action01]
> 
> Done. See:
> https://github.com/sysapps/app-
> uri/commit/3f180e9439bd1631b78ce66113e904bcaa9daffb
> 
> > Action02: make it clearer that uuid is not a hard requirement [recorded
> in http://www.w3.org/2013/08/27-sysapps-minutes.html#action02]
> 
> 
> The spec already states that:
> 
> “It is recommended that a [UUID] be used as the value of the authority
> component (but it's not mandatory! Other types of authorities, like
> reverse domain name notation, are allowed). Using a [UUID] makes it
> improbable that two URIs will be alike, and also makes them hard to guess.
> "

Looks good to me.

Thanks!

Kr Wonsuk.

Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 04:37:21 UTC