- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 22:50:26 +0100
- To: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 21:15, Jonas Sicking wrote: > I actually wouldn't want the app:// protocol to go to CR that quickly. Neither would I. The HTTP semantics/responses part is "new", it has never been implemented by anyone - nor have I gotten review of it apart from Giri. So, even if we wanted to, I don't think anyone would pass the (yet to be created) test suite. > I think there are a number of tricky issues, such as origins, that > goes hand-in-hand with the security model and with the runtime spec. Agreed. > So I think the app:// protocol should be developed in the same WG and > on the same mailing list as the runtime and security specs. > > I've personally given up on making that be the webapps list right now. I don't really mind where it happens; I'd be happy if people just read it at this point and gave me some feedback. ^_^
Received on Sunday, 12 May 2013 21:50:57 UTC