Re: publication of FPWD of Runtime and Security Model for Web Applications

On Tuesday, 19 March 2013 at 07:04, Dave Raggett wrote:

> I've been asked if it is possible to add some more information to the  
> state of this document section on expected evolution of the document,  
> e.g. major open issues, stability of current proposal.
>  
> Any suggestions?
I think this is a good idea. There are a lot of things we have already captured as bugs, plus there is controversy about DOMRequest, etc. These should be captured either directly as ISSUE: or in the SoTDā€¦ I would rather issues be directly in the document, because few people read the SoTD.   

--  
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 13:51:26 UTC