- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 10:18:08 +0000
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, public-sysapps@w3.org
On Monday, 4 March 2013 at 09:47, Robin Berjon wrote: > On 28/02/2013 18:18 , Mounir Lamouri wrote: > > You can find the proposal here: > > http://www.w3.org/wiki/System_Applications#Editorial_process_.28proposal.29 > > > > Would the group accept to use this editorial process? > > Overall, +1 from me. Just some small nits: > > • I don't think you need to consider an "integrator" role. That should > be the same thing as the editor. There are multiple editors. The integrator's responsibility is to make sure a pull request is consistent, of quality, and has group consensus. > • You mention wanting to make sure that the mailing list is in the loop for all discussions; one thing you could do is make sure various > notifications from the repo are sent to it. Has anyone managed to do this directly from GH? -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 10:18:45 UTC