Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD

Does this mean that we are ready for a call for FPWD?

/ Jonas

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote:
> On 01/03/13 05:40, Jungkee Song wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote:
>>> On 21/02/13 09:51, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 07:13, Jungkee Song wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry for not replying earlier.
>>>
>>> I would gladly add one Samsung's editor as co-editor of Mozilla's
>>> proposal as a sign of goodwill. However, as said in my previous email,
>>> the editor list can change over time and anyone actively editing the
>>> specification should be listed as co-editor.
>>>
>>> If that works for Samsung, let me know which person should be added as
>>> co-editor and I will update the proposal to have it ready for a CfC.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed. Ming Jin has been nominated as the co-editor. Please add him
>> to the list.
>
> I have updated the specification accordingly:
> http://mounirlamouri.github.com/sysapps/proposals/RunTime-Security/Overview.html
>
> --
> Mounir
>

Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 00:06:15 UTC