Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model

On 19/02/13 08:47, Jungkee Song wrote:
>> Except that, the main differences between those two documents are the API
>> to manage the applications but we believe that there will be a lot of work
>> on those anyway and whether we use Mozilla's or Samsung's API as a base,
>> it is quite unlikely that the final document will look similar to the
>> first iteration.
>>
>> As a consequence, we would like to propose to use Mozilla's document as a
>> base for the Execution and Security Model specification and update the
>> document to include the missing features from the Samsung execution model
>> which the Mozilla draft doesn't currently have. Specifically we propose to
>> add the following properties on the Application interface:
>> onlaunched, onterminated, onresumed, onpaused as well as the hide()
>> function. Is there anything else we could add to make this go forward?
>>
> 
> We agree to consider the above properties in the interface definition.
> 
> With all due respect, we agree to use Mozilla's proposal as a base document in order to move it forward. :-) Once you agree, I will prepare the document incorporating execution model and browsing context content in which you can add the interface changes later.

I'm not sure I understand what you are saying so I just sent an email to
propose a document with the mentioned changes as a FPWD.

Cheers,
--
Mounir

Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 18:51:55 UTC