W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sysapps@w3.org > August 2013

RE: [DOMError]: Subclassing DOMError to increase granularity of error handling?

From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 12:49:41 +0200
To: 'Anne van Kesteren' <annevk@annevk.nl>
CC: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6DFA1B20D858A14488A66D6EEDF26AA301A33878B423@seldmbx03.corpusers.net>
Ok, thanks for this information Anne. I guess that I should keep the current solution in the Raw Socket API until the DOMException solution has been defined in the DOM specification.

BR
  Claes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: annevankesteren@gmail.com [mailto:annevankesteren@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
> Sent: den 6 augusti 2013 11:54
> To: Nilsson, Claes1
> Cc: www-dom@w3.org; public-sysapps@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [DOMError]: Subclassing DOMError to increase granularity
> of error handling?
> 
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Nilsson, Claes1
> <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com> wrote:
> > WDYT about this approach? Is this a reasonable solution?
> 
> DOMError is going away. We only need DOMException. Allen (editor of
> ECMAScript) did suggest we do something like what you suggest. Have
> DOMException.prototype.subname which gives a more detailed name and
> ideally have DOMException.name be "DOMException" but we can probably no
> longer do that. Still need to work out the details here unfortunately
> as apparently last time we thought we figured error handling out we
> didn't :/
> 
> 
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 10:50:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:36:14 UTC