Re: Request to move app: URI to FPWD

On Thursday, 18 April 2013 at 8:26 PM, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote:

> > Instead of looking at file://, fs://, efs://, maybe you could review the app:// scheme spec? I think that would be more constructive and helpful for the working group. One implementer is already using app: (FxOS), so there is good precedence for standardising it. 
> 
> 
> 
> This is a reasonable request. I will do so and provide written feedback in addition to the limited items I raised last week.
> 

Awesome, thank you - looking forward to your feedback! I'll start a new repo tomorrow for the manifest so we have a place to collect bugs. Larger architectural issues we can discuss on the list, or course.  

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 19:55:11 UTC