Re: updated draft charter

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Carr, Wayne <wayne.carr@intel.com> wrote:
>
>>  > Is it possible to word the draft so that it is possible to add new
>> work on yet to be named APIs without rechartering? For example, under
>> phase 2:****
>>
>> > "Other APIs that adhere to the Goals and the Scope of the charter and
>> which do not directly conflict with the chartered deliverables of another
>> Working Group."****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Lawyers wouldn’t be too happy about that when trying to figure out scope
>> of possible licensing commitments.  That would be anything is in scope
>> that isn’t being done elsewhere.
>>
>
> no, since the above language scopes "Other APIs" to Goals/Scope and
> non-conflict; in any case, since we aren't lawyers, perhaps we shouldn't
> presuppose their reaction (if any)?
>

p.s. in any case, that's what the call for exclusions phase is for at FPWD
time, yes?