W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sysapps@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Deliverables

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 21:43:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+c2ei85Ku93eduYoVT3y_z9X=0VURqTLGanSBPh74gX=x+a-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
Cc: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, public-sysapps@w3.org
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com> wrote:
>> From: Mounir Lamouri [mailto:mounir@lamouri.fr]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 5:50 PM
>> To: public-sysapps@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Deliverables
>>
>> On 05/30/2012 04:36 AM, Jungkee Song wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > For the first round, I would like to count the following APIs, too:
>> > - Application
>> > - Media Storage
>> > - Bluetooth
>>
>> As Adam said, Media Storage is a bit too controversial to be in the
>> first set. Also, regarding the Bluetooth API, it doesn't seem like a
>> priority to me.
>
> Although Media Storage is a controversial topic, we won't avoid the effort
> to hammer out consensus anyway. I think this is a right place to talk.
> Why don't we start trying?

I'd be ok with trying to do this API (I think it's a very interesting
API since it provides a missing piece for a large number of types of
applications). However I will say that I don't think it will be a
small task to reach consensus on this API given how different the
Mozilla/Google/Tizen proposals are.

/ Jonas
Received on Monday, 4 June 2012 04:44:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 June 2012 04:44:48 GMT